### Tournament Math: Antianxiety Medication?

**Introduction**

For those of you going to the World Open this week, let me try to ease your anxiety so you can relax and have some fun.

Objectively speaking, there is a range of possible tournament results from zero to nine (there are nine total games at the World Open), and a distribution of probabilities that you will get one of those results.

People tend to get anxious when they start to focus on the tail ends of the distribution ('What if I crash and burn and get 0/9', or 'Oh boy what if I get 9/9 and bring home the million dollar prize?'). Both of these extremes are unlikely (unless you are playing in the wrong section), and tend to evoke extreme emotions that may distract you from the game itself.

**Getting practical with the mathtical**

To inject reality into the situation, let's look at the math. The following graph shows the probability distributions of overall tournament scores, assuming for each game you have a fixed probability of winning (given in each panel), and that the games are independent. Basically this is the scenario of 'How many heads will you get when you throw nine biased coins?' Obviously these assumptions are simplistic, but the general point holds even if we were to make things more complicated.

The bottom distribution shows the probability of getting different overall tournament scores if the probability of a win in an individual game is 0.8 (this number means if you were to play 100 games, you'd win about 80 of them). If you are lucky enough to have this for each game, then you are either a sandbagger and should be playing in a higher section, or just at the top of your game. Either way, you can expect to score between six and nine points at the tournament, and fewer than six would be disappointing.

(Note while most chess players probably subjectively feel that the probability of winning is much higher than 0.5 in any given game, clearly if you are in the right section and the rating system works, this cannot be the case for most players).

The middle panel shows the more realistic case of a fair coin, when the probability of winning an individual game is 0.5. Note the distribution of tournament scores peaks where it should, around 4 or 5 games won. Technically, the mean number of wins is 4.5, so you should do something like win four and draw one. For those playing in the right section, this is probably what you should realistically expect. Don't worry too much about going 0/9, and don't put too much pressure on yourself to win nine games. Yes, it would be nice, but relax and have fun. If you were just destroying everyone you would be in the wrong section.

The top panel shows the distribution of overall results when the probability of winning an individual game is 0.2. In this case, you indeed have a very low chance of winning many games, and can expect to get between zero and four points at the tournament. This might be a scenario when you are playing up a section and really trying to learn, so buck up you have a lot to learn from the people you are playing!

**From slices to pies**

The above probability histograms are really just slices in a three-dimension space with probability of winning on the x-axis, tournament score on the y-axis, and overall probability on the z-axis. This more general plot is shown below.

Despite the fact that it is awesomely cool, the above plot is hard to interpret. Hence, let's represent the same information as a contour plot below. In the contour plot, the x- and y-axes are as above, but the z-axis is represented by "isoprobability" lines. That is, the parts of the probability mountain with the same height (probability) are traced together in one line of a single color--the bar on the right gives the mapping from line color to probability.

We can see that as the probability of winning an individual game goes up, the center of the distribution of overall tournament results shifts up as well. Interestingly, this relationship looks quite linear, and we can quantify the expected points as a function of individual win probability:

Expected Net Points=9xP(one win)I drew this linear function as a dotted line in the diagram.

That equation makes sense: if P(one win)=0.5, then Net Points expected is exactly 4.5. If P(win)=0, then you will win zero games. Etc..

**Take-home message**

So, the take home message is: Chill Out! If you are playing in the right section, then there is a distribution of likely scenarios. Given an honest assessment of your skills within that section, you get a picture of what reasonable (as opposed to extremely optimistic or pessimistic) expectations are. Don't focus on the tail ends of the distribution. Just forget all that crap, go in and play chess. When you start to focus on the tails, and get anxious, focus on the whole distribution, bring yourself back in line with mathematical reality.

That said, of course go in there and take home some scalps, but most importantly have fun with the game.

## 14 Comments:

Or you can take real antianxiety medication, like the benzodiazepines I got prescribed today (though not for chess playing, or anxiety for that matter).

Don't forget that as the tournament goes on, you will play people with results similar to yours, which should bring your overall results closer to the 50% mark than flipping a coin every time would.

Dfan: great point! As I mentioned, the assumption that the probability of winning stays the same (and is independent of other rounds) is simplistic. In practice, losing effects different people different ways. Some become more likely to win after a loss, others get depressed and more likely to lose.

But your point is even better: there are mechanisms in place within the tournament structure that try to make your probability of winning around 0.5. I hadn't even considered that!

My only fear is that when my chess epiphany occurs and my true chess talent become apparent as I battle against the world's elite, I will be accused of foul play for such a sudden and dramatic increase in rating.

J.A. Topfke

JA: lol. I wish I had that fear. :o

JA: tell them you've been in secret training with Kasparov for the last 10 years, and only now were you ready to show off your skill.

way to make something simple sound complicated.

jay: lighten up

Wait! Last year we had the Labowski round. Surely, that adds to the probability of an AWESOME time and definitely lowers anxiety.

Chessloser was credited for playing round 4 in his bathrobe and consuming a white russian. Others followed suit ( Wang, if I recall) LikesForest and I held out as KNight Errant MDLM staff photgraphers and making sure we had the correct ( and sober) blogger coverage.

Damn this economy! I'll be sure to return there next year. For those looking for good photos of this year's event, check out Chris Bird's facebook page:

http://www.facebook.com/home.php?ref=home#/album.php?aid=2025064&id=1377800962&ref=nf

However, a player has more subjective control over outcomes in chess as opposed to coin flips. I could for instance impose my will on a 0-9 outcome at the world open.

Hey BDK i just broke 2000, or i will in the next rating issue anyway. I annotated the game, please see. Sry for the plug, i wont do this often. Time to write a yellow book and quit chess forever. :)

Isn't this what one calls a statistical overview of the chances one has according to rating?

Afterall the points one achieves at a tournament all has to do with 1) ratingdifference you and your opp, 2) form during the tournament, 3) stamina.

I played in the poor man's World Open at the Marshall Chess Club. 12 players!

Anyone going to the US Open in August?

Here is a small tool that similarly estimates points & place in chess tournament: http://chess-db.com/public/tperf.jsp

Post a Comment

<< Home