Thursday, August 16, 2007
RSS / Atom
Recent Posts
- Rotating blogroll!!!
- The Samurai Warrior Returns, with Pale
- Catch 22 at ICC
- Getting people to read your blog: blog cred
- Tacticus maximus!
- Conditions for a kingside attack
- Insert witty French witticism here
- Are you part of the problem or part of the solution?
- From the desk of Howard Goldowsky (and some news)
- Empiricism versus rationalism. And next up, McNeil...
Email me:
bluedevil
-d.o.t. here-
knight
~a.t. symbol~
yahoo
-another d.o.t-
the business suffix
Godaddy sucks
3 Comments:
hm. maybe 1.c4 with the idea of 2.ne4 ?
1.qc3 could work too: 1...d4 2.Na4 , but I think c4 is better, bc. q and n can stay where they are.
kind regards,
svensp
Yep, c4 and the position remains roughly equal. Both sides have some interesting fighting chances.
Also possible is Qc3 or even Qg1, but c4 is best I think.
Post a Comment
<< Home